ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2026
Exploring spillovers of vaccines: A practical application of the Expanded Impact Inventory.
Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Including all relevant costs and effects in economic evaluations can be challenging, especially when spillovers in other individuals or sectors are likely. Previous literature has highlighted that the combination of relevant spillovers is evaluation and context specific. This emphasises the importance of identifying (the evidence on) relevant spillovers systematically. Spillovers are defined here as "all impacts from an intervention on all parties or entities other than the users of the intervention under evaluation". In this study, we evaluate the feasibility of applying the recently introduced Expanded Impact Inventory to identify (evidence on) potentially relevant spillovers. If feasible, this approach can help to determine the analytical scope of health economic evaluations and to identify the available knowledge (gaps). As an illustration, we use two case studies: vaccination against acute respiratory diseases and herpes zoster. Using the inventory to guide a rapid review of economic studies in these disease areas, we found that commonly considered spillovers are patient healthcare and productivity costs-in so far these are borne by others than the patient-, as well as caregiving time costs. Spillover impacts on health, broader quality of life, and productivity of others, especially caregivers, were often highlighted as important, though evidence remains limited. This application demonstrates that using the Expanded Impact Inventory to identify (evidence on) potentially relevant spillovers and delineate the scope of economic evaluations is feasible. Using this framework across various interventions and disease areas can promote the systematic consideration of broader impacts in economic evaluations, strengthening the evidence base for spillovers and improving the comprehensiveness and comparability of economic evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42909534What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.