SynthesisMolecular biology reports2026
Promising therapeutic interventions for preserving endothelial glycocalyx integrity in sepsis: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endothelial Glycocalyx (eGCX) degradation is a major pathophysiological event in sepsis, contributing to endothelial dysfunction, vascular permeability, inflammation, microvascular thrombosis, and organ failure. Despite its importance, eGCX-targeted therapies are not currently incorporated into standard sepsis management. This systematic review summarized clinical and preclinical evidence on therapeutic and experimental strategies aimed at preserving or restoring eGCX integrity in sepsis. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched through August 2026. Eligible human and animal studies evaluated eGCX-directed interventions in sepsis or experimental sepsis models. Outcomes included circulating biomarkers such as syndecan-1, heparan sulfate, and hyaluronan, microcirculatory measures including perfused boundary region, and structural assessment by microscopy. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2, SYRCLE, and ROBINS-I. Twenty-one studies were included, comprising 17 animal and 4 human studies. Interventions included ascorbic acid, sulodexide, doxycycline, activated protein C, heparin-based therapies, antithrombin, recombinant thrombomodulin, therapeutic plasma exchange, colivelin, liposomal nanocarriers of preassembled eGCX, and rhamnan sulfate. Several interventions reduced eGCX shedding, improved endothelial barrier or microvascular function, and, in some experimental models, preserved or restored eGCX ultrastructure. Overall, the eGCX represents a promising therapeutic target in sepsis; however, most evidence remains preclinical, and well-designed clinical studies using standardized eGCX outcomes are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42909518What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.