ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Evidence-based treatment of valvular heart disease].
Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Valvular heart disease is a major cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide. As the prevalence of most valvular heart diseases increases with age, population ageing has led to a substantial increase in disease burden. Due to advanced age or significant comorbidities, many patients are considered unsuitable for conventional surgery. Whereas medical therapy was therefore often the only treatment option in the past, the rapid evolution of transcatheter interventions has fundamentally transformed the management of valvular heart disease over the past two decades. Today, effective catheter-based treatment options are available for virtually all valvular pathologies. For patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, the prognostic benefit of transcatheter aortic valve replacement is firmly established. Large randomized trials have demonstrated non-inferiority of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with surgical aortic valve replacement across most patient populations, leading to an expanding use of this approach in younger and lower-risk patients. Similarly, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for mitral and tricuspid regurgitation has been shown to improve symptoms, quality of life, and heart failure-related hospitalizations. In carefully selected patients with secondary mitral regurgitation, this strategy also confers a survival benefit. In addition, dedicated transcatheter devices have recently emerged as promising treatment options for native aortic regurgitation. Given the rapid evolution of transcatheter therapies, current efforts are increasingly focused on selecting the optimal treatment strategy for the individual patient and determining the optimal timing of intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.