ArticleJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2026
Acceptability and adherence to antiseptic gargling among Malaysian umrah pilgrims: A mixed-methods quasi-experimental pilot study.
Article in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Respiratory tract infections are common among Umrah pilgrims due to crowding, close interpersonal contact, shared accommodation, and prolonged exposure to respiratory pathogens. Gargling has been proposed as a simple non-pharmaceutical respiratory hygiene intervention, but evidence on its feasibility, adherence, and acceptability during pilgrimage remains limited. Methods: A mixed-methods, quasi-experimental pilot-controlled study was conducted among 90 Malaysian Umrah pilgrims from two travel batches, allocated by batch to an intervention group (n=46) or control group (n=44). The intervention group received mouthwash and was instructed to gargle with 20 mL twice daily. Quantitative outcomes included self-reported respiratory symptoms, coughing frequency, impact on Umrah activities, and adherence. Open-ended responses explored perceived benefits, facilitators, barriers, and user experiences. Results: Most participants were female (65.6%) and aged 40-59 years. Cough and sore throat were the most commonly reported symptoms in both groups. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups for individual respiratory symptoms, number of symptoms, coughing frequency, or impact on Umrah activities (all Conclusion: Significant reductions in respiratory symptoms were not observed, but antiseptic gargling was acceptable, feasible, and generally well received. Larger multicentre studies incorporating objective microbiological outcomes and adherence-enhancing strategies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.