ArticleJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2026
Current practices and attitudes toward rectus sheath closure among surgeons: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rectus sheath closure is a modifiable factor for incisional hernia, wound dehiscence, and surgical site infection. Guidelines recommend continuous small-bites closure using a slowly absorbable monofilament suture with a suture to wound length (SL:WL) ratio of at least 4:1. However, few data are available from obstetrics and gynecology, which is the specialty with the largest number of abdominal closures worldwide. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 58 surgeons with various levels of training and specialties to assess rectus sheath closure techniques, self-reported complications, and attitudes toward changing practice. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare professional levels. Predictors of complication occurrence were identified using logistic regression. Results: Most participants were obstetricians and gynecologists (84.48%) working in academic hospitals (72.41%). Only 5.17% achieved the recommended SL:WL ratio ≥4:1, whereas 29.31% reported a ratio of 1:1 and 18.97% adhered to no specific ratio. The mean bite size (0.87 cm) and inter-suture distance (0.98 cm) were approximately double the recommended standard of 5 mm. Two-thirds (67.24%) used both monofilament and braided sutures despite the recommendation to only use monofilament. Self-reported incidence of hernia (1.72%) was lower than prospective estimates (11-30%). Surgeons with 6-10 years of experience had significantly higher odds of reporting complications than those with >15 years (odds ratio = 33.54; 95% confidence interval = 1.42-1724.32; Conclusion: Surgeons, mainly obstetricians and gynecologists, significantly deviated from the recommended rectus sheath closure techniques. The high level of non-compliance and willingness to change suggested a lack of infrastructure and training, and structured educational interventions were identified as a priority target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.