ReviewRSC advances2026
Recent advances in the synthesis, structural diversification, and biological evaluation of sulfamethoxazole derivatives.
Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sulfamethoxazole is a clinically important sulfonamide antibiotic that remains a valuable pharmacophore in medicinal chemistry due to its established antibacterial activity and structural versatility. However, the emergence of antimicrobial resistance and limitations related to solubility, pharmacokinetics, and safety have encouraged extensive structural modification of the sulfamethoxazole scaffold. This review summarizes recent advances in the synthesis, structural diversification, and biological evaluation of sulfamethoxazole derivatives, with emphasis on developments reported during the last five years. Major synthetic approaches discussed include conventional sulfonamide-bond formation, greener synthetic protocols, metal complexation, Schiff base formation, nucleophilic substitution, amidation, cyanoacetylation, chloroacetylation, diazotization, heterocyclic annulation, and hybridization with other pharmacologically active scaffolds. Attention is given to how modification of the aromatic amino group, sulfonamide moiety, and isoxazole ring influences physicochemical properties and biological performance. The review also highlights sulfamethoxazole-based metal complexes, heterocyclic hybrids, prodrug-like derivatives, and nanocarrier-based systems as promising strategies to enhance antimicrobial potency and broaden biological applications, including anticancer, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, enzyme-inhibitory, and antibiofilm activities. Overall, this review provides an integrated overview of the relationship between synthetic design, structural features, and biological activity, offering useful guidance for the future development of sulfamethoxazole-based therapeutic candidates.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.