Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42909358›Full record

ArticleCase reports in dermatology

Nipple Melanoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Ana Ortiz González, Marina Torrent Gracia, Claudia Alejandra Capozzi, Sebastián Ortiz Reina, José Balsalobre Yago, Antonio Piñero Madrona, Pablo Cerezuela-Fuentes

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in dermatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana Ortiz GonzálezDepartment of Pathology, Hospital General Universitario "Santa María del Rosell", Complejo Hospitalario de Cartagena, Cartagena, Spain.
Marina Torrent GraciaDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital General Universitario "Santa María del Rosell", Complejo Hospitalario de Cartagena, Cartagena, Spain.
Claudia Alejandra CapozziDepartment of Pathology, Hospital General Universitario "Santa María del Rosell", Complejo Hospitalario de Cartagena, Cartagena, Spain.
Sebastián Ortiz ReinaDepartment of Pathology, Hospital General Universitario "Santa María del Rosell", Complejo Hospitalario de Cartagena, Cartagena, Spain.
José Balsalobre YagoMedical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario "Santa Lucía", Complejo Hospitalario de Cartagena, Cartagena, Spain.
Antonio Piñero MadronaHead of Breast Surgery Unit, Surgery Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario "Virgen de la Arrixaca", InstitutoMurciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB) Ciudad de Murcia, Professor of Surgery Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Pablo Cerezuela-FuentesMedical Oncolgy Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario "Virgen de la Arrixaca", Ciudad de Murcia, InstitutoMurciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB), Murcia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Primary melanoma of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) is an exceptionally rare malignancy and may pose significant diagnostic challenges because of its overlap with other breast and cutaneous neoplasms. We report a case of primary NAC melanoma initially misdiagnosed as an undifferentiated sarcoma. Case Presentation: A 93-year-old woman presented with an 8-month history of a bleeding, ulcerated, exophytic lesion of the left nipple. Imaging demonstrated a suspicious NAC mass with radiologically enlarged ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes, while fine-needle aspiration was negative. Core biopsy suggested an undifferentiated sarcoma. Following modified radical mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection, histopathological and immunohistochemical examination established the diagnosis of ulcerated invasive superficial spreading melanoma of the NAC (Breslow ≥60 mm, pT4bN0M0, and AJCC stage IIC). All 15 lymph nodes were negative. No adjuvant treatment was administered, and the patient remains disease-free 26 months after diagnosis. Conclusion: NAC melanoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of persistent nipple lesions. Extensive histopathological assessment and comprehensive immunohistochemical studies are essential, particularly in poorly differentiated tumors with heterogeneous marker expression. Early recognition and multidisciplinary management may help avoid diagnostic delays and inappropriate treatment.

Indexed as

Case reportNipple melanomaReview

Identifiers

PMID42909358
PMCPMC13685028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.