ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Immediate nipple reconstruction as part of one-stage total breast reconstruction: a vascular design-based narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autologous breast reconstruction restores breast volume and contour after mastectomy, but reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex remains central to the perception of breast completeness. Traditionally, nipple reconstruction has been delayed until the reconstructed breast mound has stabilized, allowing the final nipple position and projection to be adjusted after soft-tissue settling and scar remodeling. However, in selected patients undergoing autologous reconstruction, simultaneous nipple reconstruction can be integrated into breast shaping, thereby reducing additional procedures, avoiding a second local incision and making use of redundant skin and soft tissue that would otherwise be discarded during flap tailoring. This strategy also allows surgeons to plan breast contour, nipple position, projection and symmetry as a single three-dimensional aesthetic unit. Nevertheless, accurate intraoperative positioning, reliable perfusion and durable long-term projection remain major technical challenges. In this case-based narrative review, we discuss the rationale, potential advantages, patient selection and limitations of immediate nipple reconstruction during autologous breast reconstruction. We further present three representative approaches from our center: a local flap, a pedicled perforator-based flap and a free perforator-based flap. These cases suggest that immediate nipple reconstruction should not be regarded as a single standardized operation, but as a flexible reconstructive strategy that should be tailored to tissue availability, vascular anatomy and aesthetic goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.