Observational studyFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Fertility preservation counselling in women with cancer: knowledge, preferences, and unmet needs from a cross-sectional survey.
Observational study in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fertility preservation (FP) is a critical survivorship issue for young women with cancer, yet gaps persist between guidelines and clinical practice. This study assesses knowledge, attitudes, and unmet needs among women referred for specialist counseling. Methods: An observational cross-sectional survey was conducted (November 2022 - June 2026) among women referred to a single tertiary oncofertility center in Rome. A Delphi-informed online questionnaire was completed before the clinical visit. Descriptive statistics and exploratory multivariable logistic regression examined post-diagnosis intention. Results: Among 284 women invited to participate, 260 completed the survey (response rate, 91.5%); 240 patients with a confirmed cancer diagnosis were included in the final analysis (median age, 32 years). Overall, 69.6% were interested in FP, and 94.2% recognized that gonadotoxic treatments could impair fertility. While 89.6% had heard of FP, only half received this information from healthcare professionals, and 24.2% knew of no specific options. Over half reported concerns regarding treatment delay, safety, effectiveness, and cost. Before diagnosis, 73.7% planned to have children; post-diagnosis, positive intention remained common, while those previously without intentions shifted toward uncertainty. In the 188-case model, pre-diagnosis intention showed the strongest association (OR 11.64, 95% CI 4.45-30.48). Given limited model performance (pseudo-R²=0.19), estimates warrant caution. Conclusions: In this single-center referred cohort, informational gaps and uncertainty remained despite high awareness. Findings confirm and contextualize prior evidence in an Italian tertiary setting and may inform similar referral pathways, but require validation in broader populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.