ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2026
EAT-10 to Screen Instrumentally Confirmed Dysphagia Following Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to profile patient-perceived swallowing impairment before and after otolaryngology-assisted anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS) and the discriminant ability of a validated patient-reported Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) to detect instrumentally confirmed (IC) dysphagia. Methods: This was a prospective single-site study of clinically referred adults undergoing otolaryngology-assisted ACSS who completed the EAT-10 survey and a fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) before and after surgery. Validated metrics of swallowing safety (Penetration Aspiration Scale, PAS) and efficiency (Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale, YPRSRS) were completed. Dysphagia was operationally defined as YPRSRS = mild, moderate, or severe and/or a PAS ≥ 6. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test, exact McNemar's test, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were conducted. Results: Sixty-four participants were included. Mean age was 57.6 (SD = 11.1), 45.3% were male, and 82.8% were revision ACSS. On average, EAT-10 score worsened by 6.0 points following ACSS, Conclusion: Patient-perceived swallowing impairment increased following otolaryngology-assisted ACSS and was associated with IC dysphagia. In conjunction with other bedside screening tools, the EAT-10 could serve as a useful patient-reported outcome for this population vulnerable to dysphagia. Level of Evidence: 2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.