ArticleClinical neuropsychiatry2026
Risk and Protective Factors for Youth Deviance After a Large-Scale Crisis: A General Strain Theory Approach.
Article in Clinical neuropsychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: deviant behaviors comprise a broad range of actions that violate the norms of the society to which individuals belong. Contemporary research drawing on General Strain Theory argues that macro-level disruptions represent strain-inducing contingencies that may precipitate deviant behaviors and highlights lack of family support and deviant peer association as variables contributing to engagement in deviance. The current study examines the associations among different dimensions of past large-scale crisis-related stress (i.e., relationships and academic life, social isolation, and fear of contagion during the COVID-19 pandemic), perceived family support, and current individual deviant behaviors among youths, while also investigating indirect associations through deviant peer association. Method: a community sample of 606 adolescents and emerging adults (Mage = 18.52 ± 2.89; %F = 48.8%) completed an online survey. Path analysis was employed to examine the relationships among the variables of interest. Results: the assessed model showed adequate fit to the data, accounting for 59.9% of variance in individual deviant behaviors. Stress due to social isolation was positively associated with individual deviant behaviors both directly and indirectly through deviant peer association, whereas stress due to fear of contagion and perceived support from family were negatively associated with individual deviant behaviors both directly and indirectly through deviant peer association. Conclusions: the current findings highlight the need to investigate the interplay of specific stress experiences, family dynamics, peer influences, and individuals' endorsement of deviance following a large-scale crisis. Results provide insights for future research and preventive efforts targeting contemporary youth deviance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.