Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42909291›Full record

ArticleClinical neuropsychiatry2026

Risk and Protective Factors for Youth Deviance After a Large-Scale Crisis: A General Strain Theory Approach.

Benedetta Tonini, Simon Ghinassi, Allison Uvelli, Fabio Ferretti, Marta Floridi, Alessandra Masti, Giacomo Gualtieri, Gabriele Prati, Silvia Casale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neuropsychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Benedetta ToniniDepartment of Health Sciences, Section of Psychology, University of Florence, via di San Salvi 12, 50135 Florence, Italy.
Simon GhinassiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, 50134, Italy.
Allison UvelliDepartment of Medical Science, Surgery, and Neurosciences; University of Siena, viale Bracci 16, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Fabio FerrettiDepartment of Medical Science, Surgery, and Neurosciences; University of Siena, viale Bracci 16, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Marta FloridiDepartment of Medical Science, Surgery, and Neurosciences; University of Siena, viale Bracci 16, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Alessandra MastiDepartment of Medical Science, Surgery, and Neurosciences; University of Siena, viale Bracci 16, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Giacomo GualtieriDepartment of Medical Science, Surgery, and Neurosciences; University of Siena, viale Bracci 16, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Gabriele PratiDepartment of Psychology, University of Bologna (Italy), Piazza Aldo Moro, 90, 47521 Cesena (FC), Italy.
Silvia CasaleDepartment of Health Sciences, Section of Psychology, University of Florence, via di San Salvi 12, 50135 Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: deviant behaviors comprise a broad range of actions that violate the norms of the society to which individuals belong. Contemporary research drawing on General Strain Theory argues that macro-level disruptions represent strain-inducing contingencies that may precipitate deviant behaviors and highlights lack of family support and deviant peer association as variables contributing to engagement in deviance. The current study examines the associations among different dimensions of past large-scale crisis-related stress (i.e., relationships and academic life, social isolation, and fear of contagion during the COVID-19 pandemic), perceived family support, and current individual deviant behaviors among youths, while also investigating indirect associations through deviant peer association. Method: a community sample of 606 adolescents and emerging adults (Mage = 18.52 ± 2.89; %F = 48.8%) completed an online survey. Path analysis was employed to examine the relationships among the variables of interest. Results: the assessed model showed adequate fit to the data, accounting for 59.9% of variance in individual deviant behaviors. Stress due to social isolation was positively associated with individual deviant behaviors both directly and indirectly through deviant peer association, whereas stress due to fear of contagion and perceived support from family were negatively associated with individual deviant behaviors both directly and indirectly through deviant peer association. Conclusions: the current findings highlight the need to investigate the interplay of specific stress experiences, family dynamics, peer influences, and individuals' endorsement of deviance following a large-scale crisis. Results provide insights for future research and preventive efforts targeting contemporary youth deviance.

Identifiers

PMID42909291
PMCPMC13684853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.