ReviewFrontiers in neuroinformatics2026
Transformers for fMRI analysis: from spatiotemporal modeling to brain foundation models.
Review in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) serves as a pivotal tool for investigating the functional organization and dynamic connectivity of the human brain, indirectly reflecting neural activity through blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signals. However, the high-dimensional spatiotemporal structure, prominent noise interference, and inter-individual variability of fMRI data pose significant challenges for traditional modeling methods in characterizing complex brain functional patterns. In recent years, the Transformer architecture has gained significant traction in fMRI data analysis, leveraging its self-attention mechanism to model global dependencies. It has demonstrated superior performance in tasks such as brain disease classification, functional connectivity modeling, and brain representation learning. Compared to convolutional and recurrent neural networks, Transformers can more effectively capture long-range spatiotemporal dependencies and offer stronger structural scalability and cross-task transfer potential. To systematically map the development of this field, this paper proposes a unified taxonomy for Transformer-fMRI methods based on modeling dimensions. It categorizes existing research into four primary paradigms: temporal modeling, spatial modeling, spatiotemporal joint modeling, and self-supervised learning, providing a comparative analysis of their structural characteristics and applicable scenarios. Furthermore, this paper summarizes the key challenges regarding computational complexity, data dependency, and interpretability, while exploring the integration of neuroscientific priors with large-scale pre-trained models. Finally, we discuss future directions for Transformers in the construction of brain foundation models and their clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.