SynthesisFrontiers in global women's health2026
Factors affecting women's disclosure of domestic abuse and healthcare professionals' preparedness to identify and respond: a systematic literature review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in global women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Domestic abuse (DA) is a significant public health and human rights issue with profound physical, psychological, and social consequences. Healthcare settings provide important opportunities for identification and support; however, disclosure by women remains inconsistent, and healthcare professionals' readiness to identify and respond varies widely. This qualitative systematic review synthesised evidence examining factors influencing women's disclosure of DA within healthcare contexts and healthcare professionals' preparedness to respond. Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus was conducted for studies published between 2000 and 2023. Additional studies were identified through reference searching. The review followed PRISMA guidance and was informed by the SPIDER framework. Qualitative and mixed-methods studies with extractable qualitative findings were included. Methodological quality was appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Findings were synthesised narratively and interpreted using a socio-ecological model to capture multilevel influences on disclosure and response. Results: Disclosure emerged as a relational and socially mediated process shaped by trust, perceived safety, validation, confidentiality, and continuity of care. Forms of "borrowed trust," mediated through social networks, influenced women's willingness to engage. Healthcare professionals' preparedness was determined by competence, confidence, emotional readiness, clarity of safeguarding responsibilities, and access to referral pathways. Structural factors, including limited consultation time, workload pressures, and organisational ambiguity, constrained effective response. Importantly, disclosure alone did not ensure improved outcomes where system readiness was inadequate. Conclusion: Improving responses to DA requires multilevel strategies extending beyond individual training. Sustainable progress depends on organisational leadership, protected time, clear referral systems, and alignment across relational and structural domains to support safe disclosure and meaningful intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.