ArticleCureus2026
Prevalence of Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients With Cervical Cancer.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a life-threatening complication that occurs in patients with cervical cancer. The purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence of DVT in patients with cervical cancer at recruitment and to assess clinically suspected DVT during treatment and up to four months after completion of primary treatment. Methods The study was performed at Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh. Fifty-three histopathologically proven patients with cervical cancer were taken for ultrasound (compression and Doppler) at recruitment. Patients were then followed up during treatment and until four months after completion of primary treatment to monitor for any clinical signs or symptoms of DVT. Results Out of 53 patients evaluated, no cases of DVT were identified among patients with cervical cancer at recruitment on compression and Doppler ultrasound, during treatment, and until four months after completion of primary treatment, based on clinical features. A negative report could result from the small number of patients studied; most were at an early stage (stage II) and may have led to a false-negative result. Additionally, none of the patients had clear cell carcinoma, and only 16 (30.18%) patients were in advanced stages (III and IV) based on radiological evaluation. Conclusions DVT was not observed in patients with cervical cancer during the study period. These findings suggest that the prevalence of DVT may be low in this population. However, they should be interpreted cautiously given the limited sample size and the absence of routine follow-up imaging. Larger prospective studies are needed to further evaluate the risk of DVT in patients with cervical cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.