ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
The ReDiKid framework: a transdisciplinary systems approach to child resilience in the digital age.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children's lives are increasingly shaped by digital environments that influence learning, social relationships, daily routines, and exposure to both opportunities and adversity. However, existing approaches often examine digital experiences, self-regulation, movement behaviors, and social context separately. This paper introduces ReDiKid (Resilient Kid in the Digital World), a developmental-systems framework for understanding resilience in late childhood, with a primary focus on children aged approximately 9-11 years. ReDiKid conceptualizes resilience as a higher-order, adversity-activated process through which adaptive functioning is maintained, restored, or reorganized over time. The framework integrates four interacting domains: psychophysiological, behavioral, contextual, and digital. It proposes four cross-domain pathways, self-regulatory capacity, movement regulation, social buffering, and digital competence, through which resources and vulnerabilities may shape responses to adversity, recovery, and subsequent adaptation. The framework distinguishes digital adversity from normative digital demands and differentiates resilience from competence, adaptive functioning, and multidimensional wellbeing. Six directional and empirically contestable propositions specify expected within-person, between-person, event-level, and contextual patterns, including conditions under which the propositions would not be supported. ReDiKid also recognizes that pathway operation may vary according to developmental stage, sex and gender, structural inequality, cultural context, neurodivergence, disability, and patterns of digital access. To support empirical testing, ReDiKid outlines a multimodal methodological architecture combining intensive longitudinal designs, ecological momentary assessment, wearable sensing, passive digital tracking, contextual data, and advanced longitudinal and multilevel analyses. ReDiKid provides a common conceptual foundation for coordinated study-specific protocols and cumulative theory development concerning child resilience in digitally mediated contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.