ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026
Case Report: Beyond chronicity: sustained multidimensional response to spinal cord stimulation three decades after traumatic spinal cord injury.
Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established treatment for refractory neuropathic pain conditions, yet evidence for its effectiveness in spinal cord injury (SCI)-related neuropathic pain, particularly after decades of persistent symptoms, remains limited. It remains unclear whether unusually prolonged pain chronicity and established neurological deficits affect the potential for a meaningful response to neuromodulation. Case presentation: We report a 60-year-old man with chronic incomplete SCI, bilateral spastic paraparesis markedly more pronounced on the left, and severe chronic neuropathic pain following a gunshot-related spinal injury sustained in 1991. Retained metallic fragments were located at T12-L1; however, a formal neurological level of injury and AIS grade could not be reliably reconstructed because a complete contemporaneous ISNCSCI examination was unavailable. The longstanding bilateral lower-extremity pain phenotype was clinically consistent with below-level SCI neuropathic pain, although formal classification was limited by the absence of an ISNCSCI-defined neurological level. After more than three decades of persistent pain refractory to multimodal conservative treatment, permanent SCS was performed with two epidural leads positioned at T8-T9. Stimulation was predominantly DTM-based, supplemented by individualized tonic programming and later activation of closed-loop stimulation. Pain intensity decreased from 8/10 at baseline to 3/10 at 12 months and 2/10 at 24 months. This sustained response was accompanied by improvements in self-reported disability, neuropathic pain features, self-rated health, and psychological well-being, together with sustained discontinuation of pain-directed pharmacological therapy. No neurological deterioration or device-related complications occurred during the 24-month follow-up. Conclusion: This case demonstrates that a clinically meaningful and sustained multidimensional response to SCS can occur despite more than three decades of SCI-related neuropathic pain and established neurological impairment. Given the limited and heterogeneous evidence for SCS in this population, interpret this finding as an individual clinical observation supporting further investigation of neuromodulation in patients with longstanding SCI-related neuropathic pain, rather than as generalizable evidence for patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.