Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42909074›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026

Case Report: Beyond chronicity: sustained multidimensional response to spinal cord stimulation three decades after traumatic spinal cord injury.

Andrea Blažević, Petar Marčinković, Fadi Almahariq, Sven Krušić, Domagoj Dlaka, Darko Chudy, Marina Raguž, Tonko Marinović

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrea BlaževićDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia.
Petar MarčinkovićDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia.
Fadi AlmahariqDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia.
Sven KrušićDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia.
Domagoj DlakaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia.
Darko ChudyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia.
Marina Raguž *Department of Neurosurgery, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia.
Tonko Marinović *Department of Neurosurgery, Dubrava University Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established treatment for refractory neuropathic pain conditions, yet evidence for its effectiveness in spinal cord injury (SCI)-related neuropathic pain, particularly after decades of persistent symptoms, remains limited. It remains unclear whether unusually prolonged pain chronicity and established neurological deficits affect the potential for a meaningful response to neuromodulation. Case presentation: We report a 60-year-old man with chronic incomplete SCI, bilateral spastic paraparesis markedly more pronounced on the left, and severe chronic neuropathic pain following a gunshot-related spinal injury sustained in 1991. Retained metallic fragments were located at T12-L1; however, a formal neurological level of injury and AIS grade could not be reliably reconstructed because a complete contemporaneous ISNCSCI examination was unavailable. The longstanding bilateral lower-extremity pain phenotype was clinically consistent with below-level SCI neuropathic pain, although formal classification was limited by the absence of an ISNCSCI-defined neurological level. After more than three decades of persistent pain refractory to multimodal conservative treatment, permanent SCS was performed with two epidural leads positioned at T8-T9. Stimulation was predominantly DTM-based, supplemented by individualized tonic programming and later activation of closed-loop stimulation. Pain intensity decreased from 8/10 at baseline to 3/10 at 12 months and 2/10 at 24 months. This sustained response was accompanied by improvements in self-reported disability, neuropathic pain features, self-rated health, and psychological well-being, together with sustained discontinuation of pain-directed pharmacological therapy. No neurological deterioration or device-related complications occurred during the 24-month follow-up. Conclusion: This case demonstrates that a clinically meaningful and sustained multidimensional response to SCS can occur despite more than three decades of SCI-related neuropathic pain and established neurological impairment. Given the limited and heterogeneous evidence for SCS in this population, interpret this finding as an individual clinical observation supporting further investigation of neuromodulation in patients with longstanding SCI-related neuropathic pain, rather than as generalizable evidence for patient selection.

Indexed as

chronic painneuromodulationneuropathic painpost-traumatic painspinal cord injuryspinal cord stimulation

Identifiers

PMID42909074
PMCPMC13683786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.