ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026
Knowledge and practices regarding postoperative neonatal pain assessment among healthcare professionals in Kinshasa: a multicenter cross-sectional survey.
Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neonatal pain remains inconsistently assessed, particularly in resource-limited settings. We assessed healthcare professionals' knowledge and reported practices regarding postoperative neonatal pain assessment in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Methods: We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional survey from August 2025 to May 2026 in ten hospitals with pediatric surgical activity. Healthcare professionals completed a 20-item questionnaire developed through expert content review and pretesting. The primary outcome was self-reported use of a standardized neonatal pain-assessment tool. A four-item knowledge score (0-4) was constructed, with ≥3 indicating high knowledge as a pragmatic study-specific threshold. Multivariable logistic regression used hospital-level cluster-robust standard errors. Results: Of 580 healthcare professionals approached, 536 returned the questionnaire; six were excluded because of >30% missing data, leaving 530 complete questionnaires for analysis. Although 86.8% recognized neonatal pain, only 10.0% reported using a standardized pain-assessment tool, and 15.3% reported postoperative pain assessment at regular intervals. Nearly all participants (99.8%) reported no dedicated neonatal pain training. The mean knowledge score was 2.16 ± 0.84, and 34.7% had high knowledge. Higher knowledge was independently associated with reported standardized tool use (adjusted OR 4.90, 95% CI 3.10-7.70; Conclusion: Reported use of standardized neonatal pain-assessment tools and regular postoperative pain assessment were low despite widespread recognition of neonatal pain. Higher knowledge was associated with reported tool use, although the association was attenuated after excluding scale recognition from the knowledge score. These findings highlight gaps in neonatal pain assessment and training, while the cross-sectional design precludes causal interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.