ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2026
Computational identification of candidate biomarkers and compounds associated with skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity improvement mediated by physical activity: an integrative multi-omics and computational chemistry study.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Insulin resistance (IR) underlies many chronic diseases. While physical activity improves skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity (IS), the underlying molecular mechanisms and targeted drug strategies remain elusive. This hypothesis-generating study integrates bioinformatics and computational chemistry using public datasets; all findings are computational predictions requiring experimental validation. Methods: Using a skeletal muscle dataset (GSE24215, n = 10) of bed rest-induced IR and exercise-reversed IR, candidate genes were identified via WGCNA and differential expression analysis. Machine learning, GSEA, and regulatory network construction identified key targets and predicted mechanisms. To address the lack of targeted drugs, a deep learning-driven drug discovery and multi-scale binding validation strategy screened candidate compounds from natural and marine product databases. Results: WNT4 was the only candidate gene repeatedly identified across both phases, displaying a bidirectional expression pattern of "upregulation after bed rest and downregulation after exercise retraining." GSEA predicts WNT4 expression is positively correlated with energy metabolism pathways (e.g., oxidative phosphorylation) and is mediated by predicted transcriptional (centered on EGR1) and post-transcriptional (hsa-miR-1238-3p/lncRNAs) regulatory networks. From over 700,000 screened compounds, three top candidates were identified. Molecular dynamics, binding free energy calculations, and quantum chemical analysis preliminarily predicted their binding stability and electronic structure features. Conclusion: This study proposes that WNT4 may play a role in the dynamic regulation of skeletal muscle IS, presenting a functional hypothesis of "endogenous compensation-stage transition". It establishes a computational drug discovery pipeline providing a candidate compound library for WNT4. Given the limited sample size (n = 10), all findings require further validation in independent cohorts and experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.