ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Trajectories of kinesiophobia over the first six months after cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator implantation: clinical, psychological, and rehabilitation predictors and their relation to functional capacity.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Kinesiophobia, an excessive fear of physical movement, is common after implantation of a cardiac pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator and may limit rehabilitation and recovery. Because fear of movement changes over time, a single measurement cannot capture how it evolves. We aimed to identify distinct trajectories of kinesiophobia during the first six months after implantation, to relate them to functional capacity, and to identify baseline factors that predict an unfavourable course. Methods: In a single centre retrospective cohort based on routinely collected structured follow-up data, 160 consecutive patients undergoing first implantation of a pacemaker or defibrillator were assessed 24 to 48 h after the procedure and again at 1, 3, and 6 months. Kinesiophobia was measured with the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia Heart and functional capacity with the six-minute walk distance. Group-based trajectory modelling identified latent trajectories. Baseline characteristics were compared across classes, and multinomial logistic regression identified independent predictors of class membership. Results: Mean kinesiophobia fell from 42.9 to 35.2 over six months, and the proportion above the high-fear threshold fell from 76.2% to 37.5%. Three trajectories emerged: low and declining (28.8%), moderate and declining (45.0%), and high and persistent (26.2%). The persistent group stayed above the clinical threshold throughout and walked the shortest distance at every visit. Compared with the low group, independent predictors of a persistent course were higher depression (odds ratio 2.26), higher anxiety (1.68), lower exercise self-efficacy (0.89), shorter baseline walk distance (0.55 per 10 m), and absence of exercise guidance (0.04 for having received guidance). Conclusion: Kinesiophobia after device implantation follows three trajectories, separated mainly by the overall level of fear. About one quarter of patients remain persistently fearful and physically limited; they can be identified early by distress, low self-efficacy, poor functional capacity, and lack of exercise guidance. Early screening and targeted exercise-based rehabilitation are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.