ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
Family physicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding complementary and alternative medicine in Saudi Arabia: an exploratory cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is increasing worldwide, driven by cultural, religious, and socioeconomic factors, as well as its holistic approach to health. While previous Saudi and regional studies have explored healthcare professionals' views on CAM, recent data on family physicians in Saudi Arabia are limited. This exploratory study examines their knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding CAM. Methods: An exploratory cross-sectional study was conducted among family physicians in Saudi Arabia using an interviewer-administered questionnaire from 1 August 2025 to 31 January 2026. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, with associations between categorical variables assessed using the chi-square or Fisher's exact tests and statistical significance set at Results: Of the 62 family physicians surveyed in Saudi Arabia, 58.1% were aged 36-45 years, and the gender distribution was equal. The majority (66.1%) held consultant positions, 40.3% had 5-10 years of experience, and only 32.3% had received formal training in CAM. Overall, knowledge of CAM was moderate. A total of 75.8% supported the integration of CAM into conventional care, while 46.8% expressed uncertainty about the existence of clear national guidelines. Attitudes toward CAM were predominantly positive: 79% supported evidence-based integration, 82.2% endorsed the inclusion of CAM education in undergraduate curricula, and 64.5% agreed that physicians knowledgeable in CAM benefit patients. However, 51.6% perceived CAM as a potential public health concern. In clinical practice, 79% recommended CAM, with meditation (64.5%), herbal supplements (59.7%), spiritual healing (58.1%), and cupping (53.2%) being the most frequently used modalities. Higher levels of CAM knowledge were significantly associated with recommending CAM to a greater proportion of patients ( Conclusion: Family physicians exhibited moderate knowledge of CAM, generally positive attitudes toward evidence-based integration, and selective clinical practices that favored culturally familiar CAM therapies. Additional research and targeted educational initiatives are required to enhance evidence-based CAM practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.