ArticleBrain & spine2026
Beyond complication rates: Nationwide neurosurgical compensation claims in a No-fault system.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Medico-legal claims are often used as proxies for malpractice burden and health care quality. However, they reflect not only underlying clinical events but also the structure of the compensation system through which they are adjudicated. This is particularly relevant in neurosurgery, where high baseline risk and uncertainty in outcome attribution may influence both the propensity to file claims and their subsequent resolution. The objective of this study was to characterize compensation outcomes, clinical domains, decision grounds, and failure-process patterns in a nationwide no-fault neurosurgical dataset. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 620 neurosurgery-related compensation decisions issued in Norway between 2015 and 2024, examining clinical domains, decision grounds, and failure-process patterns. Results: Compensation was granted in 93 of 620 decisions (15.0%). Nontraumatic spinal disorders represented the largest domain (225/620, 36.3%) but had a low grant rate (23/225, 10.2%), whereas grant rates were higher in cerebrospinal fluid and shunt disorders (17/43, 39.5%) and trauma (9/29, 31.0%). Within nontraumatic spinal disorders, cervical degenerative disease showed particularly low compensability (8/149, 5.4%). Among granted decisions, the leading failure-process domains were preoperative or diagnostic (35/93, 37.6%), intraoperative or procedural (22/93, 23.7%), and perioperative or postoperative management (13/93, 14.0%). Conclusion: In this nationwide neurosurgical series from a no-fault compensation system, compensation was granted in 15.0% of decisions and primarily reflected avoidable failures along the care pathway rather than adverse outcomes alone. Compensation decision data should therefore not be interpreted as complication rates, but as system-filtered signals of compensable and avoidable harm shaped by adjudicatory framework and system design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.