ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2026
Estimating Heart Failure Health Status From Multimodal Wearables: Implementation of a Feature-Engineering Framework for KCCQ-12 Prediction.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04191356 (An Observational, Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Feasibility of a Novel Mobile Health Monitoring Platform to Capture Patient-centered Outcomes Measures Among Patients With Heart Failure), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Observational, Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Feasibility of a Novel Mobile Health Monitoring Platform to Capture Patient-centered Outcomes Measures Among Patients With Heart Failure (HF)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Routine monitoring of symptom burden and quality of life in heart failure (HF) patients is limited by intermittent sampling of validated instruments, such as the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12). As more wearable devices track physiological measures in real-world settings than ever before, we propose an exploratory implementation of a feature-engineering framework to bridge this sampling gap, approximating KCCQ-12 scores and patient health status from wearable features. In this narrative, we processed data from the 8-week multicenter observational study of patients with HF (New York Heart Association, class I-III) wearing Everion multisensor smartwatches: "Evaluating Mobile Health Tool Use for Capturing Patient-centered Outcomes Measures in Patients with HF" (NCT04191356). Then, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator logistic regression was applied for feature selection, followed by binary classification and linear mixed-effects modeling to predict KCCQ-12 scores. Among patients generating sufficient data (n=59), there were 173 unique KCCQ-12 observations. From 7235 candidate features, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator retained 88 predictors (Supplemental Table 1, available online at https://www.mcpdigitalhealth.org/), including the top predictors: passive functional capacity metrics (positive), daily steps/walking time (positive), nocturnal respiratory variability (negative), and patient-reported dyspnea (negative). Binary classification models achieved a test of area under the curve=0.77 (sensitivity, 91%; specificity, 63%), and linear mixed-effects models produced a root mean squared error of 14.7 (R
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.