ReviewBiodesign research2026
Research progress in gene editing of Brassicaceae crops.
Review in Biodesign research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brassicaceae crops are globally important economic plants, whose yield and quality directly affect the supply of edible oil and vegetables. Most of these crops are polyploids with complex genomes and numerous homoeologous gene copies, which demand high efficiency and specificity from gene editing tools, while providing ideal models for studying the rules of polyploid genome editing. Traditional breeding methods, such as crossbreeding and mutation breeding, are constrained by long cycles, low efficiency, and poor specificity, making them insufficient for precise genetic improvement. Gene editing technologies, characterized by precision, efficiency, and targeting specific genomic loci, are core tools for crop breeding. Among these, ZFNs and TALENs rely on protein-DNA recognition and are complicated and costly to design; CRISPR-Cas, which achieves precise recognition through base pairing between guide RNA and target DNA, is simple, efficient, and the most widely used editing tool. Base and prime editors enable single-nucleotide substitutions or small fragment insertions without generating double-strand breaks, making them suitable for directed modification of point mutations. This review summarizes the progress of gene editing in Brassicaceae for bolting/flowering, plant architecture, nutritional quality, tolerance to abiotic stresses (temperature, salinity, drought, heavy metals), and resistance to biotic stresses (diseases, pests). We analyze challenges, including off-target effects, difficulties in polyploid genome editing, and imperfect genetic transformation systems, and discuss future directions integrating gene editing with multi-omics and artificial intelligence. This review aims to provide a theoretical basis and technical support for precise molecular breeding of Brassicaceae crops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.