Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42908862›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors reports2026

Recovery capital and substance(s) of choice among adolescents: Exploratory analyses.

Jules Boyle, Jordan Jurinsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jules BoyleEliot-Pearson Department of Child Study and Human Development, Tufts University, 105 College Ave, Medford, MA, 02155, United States of America.
Jordan JurinskyEliot-Pearson Department of Child Study and Human Development, Tufts University, 105 College Ave, Medford, MA, 02155, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Recovery capital is the availability of resources to support recovery. Prior research suggests a relationship between substances of choice (SOC) and recovery capital. This study explored the relationship between SOC and recovery capital among adolescents attending a recovery high school. Methods: A secondary data analysis of data from the SEARS project was conducted. Participants ( Results: A Kruskal-Wallis test to compare recovery capital across number of SOC groups indicated a significant difference, χ2( Discussion: The current study identified a relationship between number of SOC and recovery capital, suggesting those who prefer "whatever is available" may benefit from additional support. More work is needed to assess the utility and implications of SOC among adolescents in recovery. Researchers who ask participants about SOC may consider allowing participants to select multiple substances and including an option for "whatever is available" to better capture use preferences.

Identifiers

PMID42908862
PMCPMC13683237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.