Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42908835›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026

A hybrid deep learning framework combining CTGAN and transformers for personalized injury mitigation in elite sports.

Tiemin Teng, Lei Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tiemin TengSchool of Physical Education, Harbin Normal University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Lei ZhangEducation College, Wenzhou Business College, Wenzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Optimizing training in elite sports while managing injury risk requires models that can learn from heterogeneous and imbalanced athlete records without contaminating evaluation data. This study presents PTI-GANFormer (Personalized Training and Injury Risk Prediction using Generative Adversarial Network-Former), an integrated decision-support framework. Its contribution is not CTGAN or self-attention in isolation; rather, it is the leakage-controlled combination of training-only conditional augmentation, three functionally separated attention pathways, five domain-engineered indicators, and a transparent risk-to-action recommendation layer. Methods: After median imputation, plausibility-aware outlier handling, categorical embedding, scaling, and feature engineering, the data were stratified into training and untouched testing partitions. CTGAN was fitted only to the training partition and generated minority-class records until each training class matched the original majority count of 7,894. The hybrid classifier distinguishes No Injury, Minor Injury, and Major Injury, while the recommendation engine converts predicted risk into advisory workload and recovery options that require practitioner review. Results: Across repeated stratified evaluation runs, PTI-GANFormer achieved an accuracy of 0.960 ± 0.004 (95% CI: 0.957-0.963), precision of 0.950 ± 0.006, recall of 0.960 ± 0.005, F1-score of 0.950 ± 0.005, and macro ROC-AUC of 0.981 ± 0.004. Discussion: These results support predictive risk stratification and decision support; they do not by themselves establish injury prevention or performance enhancement.

Indexed as

athlete performanceCTGANdeep learninginjury riskpersonalized trainingsports analyticssports injury predictiontransformer models

Identifiers

PMID42908835
PMCPMC13683201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.