ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Non-invasive preoperative MRI-based deep transfer learning radiomics model for predicting meningioma brain invasion.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Current preoperative assessment of meningioma brain invasion (BI) demands imaging analytical frameworks that optimize computational efficiency while capturing multidimensional tumor-pathology correlations. Building upon the inherent advantages of 2.5D MRI in synthesizing multiplanar biological data with manageable processing loads, this study innovatively integrates deep transfer learning (DTL), a technique bridging pretrained network knowledge with target domain adaptation, to systematically identify tumor-invasive biological signatures and develop an optimized predictive system using preoperative contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI). Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 674 patients with pathologically confirmed meningiomas, including 53 with BI and 621 without BI. The cohort was stratified into a training set and an independent test set. Tumor regions of interest (ROIs) were delineated on CE-T1WI, and radiomics and DTL features were extracted. Radiomics and DTL features were fused via early fusion, followed by feature selection. Within the training cohort, five-fold cross-validation was performed, with SMOTE applied exclusively to the training portion of each fold; validation folds and the independent test set retained their original class distributions. Results: The effectiveness of the models was compared using the area under the ROC curve (AUC). In the training set, ComM achieved an AUC of 0.977, while in the test set, its AUC reached 0.935. ComM demonstrated the best performance (training set: AUCComM > AUCDTLRM > AUCRadM > AUCClinM > AUCDTLM; test set: AUCComM > AUCDTLRM > AUCRadM > AUCDTLM > AUCClinM), showing excellent preoperative predictive capability for meningioma BI. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated good model fit, and the calibration curve revealed that ComM was closest to the ideal curve. Conclusion: ClinM, RadM, DTLM, DTLRM, and ComM based on 2.5D CE-T1WI all exhibited good performance in predicting meningioma BI. The clinical-radiomics-DTL fusion model (ComM) demonstrated the highest efficacy, suggesting that DTL provides additional features correlated with meningioma BI that differ from radiomics features. This model shows potential clinical utility for preoperative prediction; however, further external validation in larger multicenter cohorts is required before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.