ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
From "Customary Morality" to "Reflective Morality": a physician's personalized competence development facilitated by narrative medicine.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Contemporary medicine faces ethical complexity arising from biotechnological advances, the growth of patients' needs, and the occurrence of cross-cultural value conflicts. These challenges expose the limits of customary morality, an unreflective and habit-driven moral framework prevalent in traditional medical training. This situation demands a more dynamic, context-sensitive, and humanistic form of moral commitment from physicians, while also requiring the development of professional competence. Narrative medicine provides a potential solution to this problem, yet its theoretical foundation remains insufficiently articulated. Method: In this paper, we propose that John Dewey's moral growth model of "reflective morality" provides a coherent and generative foundation for narrative medicine and links this process to competence development within competency-based medical education (CBME). Results: The core tools of narrative medicine, close reading and reflective writing, are grounded in Dewey's moral development model, which encompasses habit, impulse, and deliberative intelligence. Reflection on habitual behavior during narrative practice works as a corrective to clinical habits, affective responses are examined and integrated through affiliation and reflection, and contextual deliberative intelligence is cultivated through reflective practice. These practices facilitate physicians' moral development, enable them to develop moral perceptiveness, decision-making capabilities, and initiative, and help them progress from passive moral conformity to active ethical agency, thereby enacting the transition from Dewey's philosophical "customary morality" to "reflective morality". This framework further facilitates the cultivation of personalized competency, a dimension of professional competence essential to patient-centered care yet resistant to conventional training. Conclusion: This paper provides a Deweyan theoretical foundation for narrative medicine by interpreting its reflective practices through Dewey's distinction between customary and reflective morality. It proposes a habit-impulse-intelligence framework to explain the moral developmental mechanisms through which narrative medicine may influence physicians' professional formation, connecting this process to the cultivation of personalized competence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.