ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Confidence-based classification of clinically significant prostate cancer on biparametric MRI using Monte Carlo dropout and Grad-CAM visualization.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Accurate early diagnosis of Clinically Significant prostate cancer (csPCa) is crucial for improving patient survival rates. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable, confidence-based deep learning model for csPCa classification using biparametric MRI (bpMRI). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on bpMRI data from 410 patients. A classification model was constructed using the visual geometry group 16-layer (VGG-16) network, incorporating gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) for visual interpretability, Monte Carlo Dropout (MC-Dropout) for uncertainty estimation, and a rejection mechanism. The model's performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the ROC curve (AUC). Results: Across all predictions, the confidence-based model achieved an overall accuracy of 79.3% before rejection. At a confidence threshold of 0.8, 80.8% of predictions were retained, among which the selective accuracy was 94.6%, with 99 false-positive and 2 false-negative predictions. Besides, the model's accuracy outperformed that of a senior radiologist (94.6% vs 90.8%). Qualitative Grad-CAM visualization demonstrated that the classifier frequently assigned high activation to MRI regions considered suspicious for csPCa; however, quantitative spatial agreement with lesion annotations was not assessed. Conclusion: This confidence-based model identifies csPCa lesions and provides reliable confidence scores without pixel-level annotations. By rejecting uncertain predictions, it enhances the transparency and safety of clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.