ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Interpretable model using serum biomarkers and intra-/peri-aneurysmal CTA radiomics for discriminating ruptured from unruptured intracranial aneurysms: an external validation retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop an interpretable model that integrates diverse machine learning algorithms, fusion strategies, intra-/perianeurysmal CTA radiomics, and serum biomarkers to differentiate ruptured from unruptured intracranial aneurysms (IAs), and to investigate the underlying biological features associated with rupture status. Methods: Totally, 744 IAs patients who underwent CTA were retrospectively enrolled. Data from Center 1 ( Results: Among the 11 models, LRSLM exhibited robust performance in the external validation set, achieving an AUC of 0.9177 with good calibration. It also demonstrated high accuracy (0.8847), recall (0.8171), and a low Brier score (0.0999), alongside greater clinical net benefit across a wide range of threshold probabilities (10-85%). Correlation analyses revealed strong positive associations between intra-aneurysmal and peri-aneurysmal radiomic features (Spearman's Conclusion: The LRSLM model achieves robust discriminative performance for differentiating ruptured from unruptured IAs. SHAP analysis enhances the interpretability of the model and may assist in identifying high-risk phenotypic features, although prospective validation is required before predictive clinical application can be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.