Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42908560›Full record

ArticleNIHR open research2026

Designing a context-specific intervention in practice: learning from a school-based physical activity intervention.

Danielle House, Abi Howard, Simona Kent-Saisch, Alice Porter, Tom Reid, Roger Morbey, Lydia Emm-Collison, Frank de Vocht, Ruth Salway, Russell Jago

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NIHR open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Danielle HousePopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6171-9922
Abi HowardPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0613-3028
Simona Kent-SaischPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, England, UK.
Alice PorterPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, England, UK.
Tom ReidPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, England, UK.
Roger MorbeyPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, England, UK.
Lydia Emm-CollisonCentre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, UK.
Frank de VochtPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, England, UK.
Ruth SalwayPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, England, UK.
Russell JagoPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, England, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3394-0176

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Public health interventions need to be designed for the intervention setting. Traditionally, to maximise internal validity, school-based pupil physical activity interventions deliver an identical programme across all settings. However, an interventions' success will depend on the context in which it is implemented, i.e. a schools' social, cultural, economic, environmental and other characteristics. In this paper we use the development of the PASSPORT (Physical Activity via a School-Specific PORTfolio) intervention as a case study for the development of context-specific public health interventions. We outline how we developed the intervention and draw out key learning from this for public health interventions generally. Methods: The PASSPORT intervention takes a portfolio approach that allows schools to select and deliver tailored intervention content that is most suitable to their setting. The intervention was developed across multiple research steps that were designed to progressively build knowledge on school context and physical activity and integrate these into intervention design. We outline these in the paper. Formative studies include: a scoping review of intervention components; school staff interviews; a rapid ethnography; and a school survey. These findings informed the co-design of the intervention tool with primary school staff and the development of the portfolio content. Finally, we conducted a pilot study in two schools to learn from both the delivery of the intervention and associated evaluation data collection. Key learning: Key learning for context-specific intervention design has been gathered around four areas: Ground intervention design in a range of data and insight, Centre contextual experience, Design for intervention flexibility and user autonomy, and, Build in processes to test and iterate. Conclusions: Each of the formative studies and the intervention design steps provided parts of the complex picture of intervention context and design needs. Combined, the results of the studies supported the development of a context-specific intervention.

Indexed as

complex interventionscontextinterventionsphysical activitypublic healthschoolssettings

Identifiers

PMID42908560
PMCPMC13680835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.