ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
From partner synchrony to corner support: interpersonal co-regulation and performance recovery in DanceSport and boxing.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sport psychology has often treated performance regulation as predominantly intrapersonal, yet competitive recovery can also be shaped by relational information. This Conceptual Analysis introduces the Relational Co-Regulation and Performance Recovery (RCPR) Model, a perturbation-centered framework for explaining how partner- and coach-generated inputs may alter recovery after within-competition disruption. Crucially, relational regulatory input is defined independently of success: an observable signal is a regulatory attempt because of its timing, content, and plausible task function, not because recovery follows. A co-regulatory transaction occurs when that input enters a temporally linked interaction loop of detection, appraisal, response, and possible updating; its outcome may be beneficial, null, or dysregulatory. The model also separates psychological state restoration, functional task restoration, and subsequent performance recovery rather than treating them as a single outcome. DanceSport and boxing are used as maximum-contrast theoretical exemplars rather than empirically established sport categories. DanceSport foregrounds predominantly continuous, reciprocal, embodied partner regulation during joint action, whereas boxing foregrounds predominantly intermittent and relatively asymmetrical coach-athlete regulation between rounds. Ecological dynamics, joint action, interpersonal emotion regulation, social support, communal coping, and coach-athlete relationship perspectives are integrated while their distinct explanatory roles are retained. Six core falsifiable propositions address incremental validity, regulatory architecture, matching and uptake, dyadic transmission and co-dysregulation, non-linear dosage constraints, and relational-training specificity. The model generates a research agenda based on perturbation-centered time series, representative simulations, quasi-experimental designs, and converging within-person evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.