ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Predicting cumulative live birth after IVF with growth hormone supplementation: the role of pretreatment duration and machine learning-based models.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To investigate the association between growth hormone (GH) pretreatment duration and cumulative live birth (CLB), identify key prognostic factors, and develop predictive models using logistic regression (LR) and machine learning (ML) algorithms among women undergoing Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women undergoing IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with GH between February 2015 and June 2023 at a single tertiary center. Five models were developed: LR, random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), and support vector machine (SVM). Performance was assessed with cross-validation and bootstrap resampling. AUROC and Brier scores evaluated discrimination and calibration. Results: Among 1,782 women, 763 (42.82%) achieved at least one live birth. Maternal age, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), antral follicle count (AFC), the assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle number, and GH duration were significant predictors. LR performed best (AUROC 0.782; Brier 0.187), showing strong calibration and interpretability. ML models had moderate discrimination but inferior calibration. AMH, AFC, and GH duration were key predictors across all methods. Conclusions: Both logistic regression and machine learning effectively predicted CLB after GH-pretreated IVF, but LR provided favorable discrimination, calibration, and interpretability. GH pretreatment ≥2 months was independently associated with higher odds of cumulative live birth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.