Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42908530›Full record

ArticleOrthopedic reviews2026

Concussion Safety Beliefs and Participation Decisions Among US Adults With a History of Concussion.

Sonali Anderson, Samuel Andrade, Omar Viswanath, Latha Ganti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samuel AndradeBrown University.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5237-5974
Omar ViswanathCreighton University School of Medicine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6124-7037
Latha GantiThe Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7717-3864

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Concussion safety education must address specific participation decisions as well as general beliefs. Method: An anonymous, opt-in online survey of 100 US adults with self-reported concussion history was analyzed descriptively. Results: Ninety-one percent endorsed avoiding same-day return after suspected concussion, and 81% would not allow a child to continue immediately after a "mild" concussion. Among the 91 endorsing no same-day return, 9 would allow immediate continuation, 7 selected sport-dependent participation, and 2 were unsure. Medical clearance was supported by 88% on an agreement item, whereas 77% selected clearance after every concussion on a separate question. Conclusions: Responses varied across differently worded safety questions; they do not establish actual behavior or national prevalence. Practical Applications: Education could distinguish immediate removal from later graduated return and explicitly address injuries described as mild. These descriptive findings support testing such messages, rather than demonstrating their effectiveness.

Indexed as

medical clearanceonline surveyreturn to playrisk communicationsymptom recognitiontraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID42908530
PMCPMC13682941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.