ArticleFarmaceuticos comunitarios2026
Comparative analysis of quality indicators in two ISO 9001:2015-certified community pharmacies (2020-2025).
Article in Farmaceuticos comunitarios, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To comparatively analyse the results of selected quality indicators from the quality management system certified in accordance with ISO 9001:2015 in two community pharmacies during the period 2020-2025. Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted in two community pharmacies certified according to ISO 9001:2015. The following indicators were analysed: dispensing errors, complaints, recorded pharmaceutical interventions, follow-up of new medical prescriptions, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported to the Andalusian Pharmacovigilance Centre, negative outcomes associated with medication (NOMs) detected, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), and documented referrals to physicians. Dispensing errors and complaints were assessed quarterly and compared using paired-sample tests. The remaining indicators were analysed annually using count regression models adjusted for year and number of operations. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in five of the eight indicators analysed. Pharmacy B showed higher values for complaints and reported ADRs, whereas Pharmacy A showed higher values for detected NOMs, ABPM, and recorded pharmaceutical interventions. No significant differences were observed between the two pharmacies in dispensing errors, documented referrals to physicians, or follow-up of new medical prescriptions. Conclusions: Quality indicators made it possible to identify variability between two ISO 9001:2015-certified community pharmacies and proved useful in supporting continuous improvement processes. The interpretation of the observed differences should take into account the contextual, organisational and healthcare-related characteristics of each pharmacy. Comparison between pharmacies remains limited by the absence of a common framework of validated indicators and reference standards in community pharmacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.