Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42908484›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2026

Insights Into Working Alliance: Predictors of Patient-Perceived Bond With Genetic Counselors Among a Diverse, Multispecialty Sample.

Ian M MacFarlane, Elena R Fisher, Deborah Cragun, Heather A Zierhut

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ian M MacFarlaneDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0896-1952
Elena R FisherDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7560-1826
Deborah CragunDepartment of Community Health Sciences, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3620-2857
Heather A ZierhutDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1941-664X

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
Genetic Counseling Processes Result in Outcomes (GC-PRO) StudyR01HG011916 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ZIERHUT, HEATHER · 2022 to 2025
$2.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR002494NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG011916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Reciprocal Engagement Model of genetic counseling practice centers the patient-provider relationship as an essential component of practice, but few quantitative studies have assessed what influences this relationship in actual genetic counseling practice. Our study explored which factors are most strongly associated with the patient-perceived bond subscale of the Working Alliance Inventory in a variety of genetic counseling sessions using a diverse patient sample across multiple clinical specialties. There were 416 participants (50.4% non-Hispanic white) seen by 41 genetic counselors (95.1% non-Hispanic white) in a variety of specialty clinics, session modalities, and session types (i.e., pre- vs. post-test) as part of Stage 1 of the GC-PRO study, which investigated how in-session processes affect patient-reported outcomes at two academic institutions and one telehealth company. Participants completed multiple validated scales measuring patient empowerment, satisfaction, decisional conflict, and other patient experience measures (e.g., working alliance and patient-centered communication). Using hierarchical linear regression modeling, predictors of the bond between participants and their genetic counselors were assessed. There were 6 significant predictors in the final model (R

Indexed as

CounselorsGenetic CounselingProfessional-Patient RelationsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Satisfactionbondgenetic counselingpatient experiencestherapeutic allianceworking alliance

Identifiers

PMID42908484
PMCPMC13688085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.