ArticleThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2026
Genome architecture modulates 35S and 5S rDNA homogenization in Asteraceae.
Article in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Concerted evolution is the model by which multicopy gene families are homogenized across genomes, with ribosomal DNA (rDNA) as its textbook example. However, the extent and efficiency of this process may vary depending on genomic factors. The plant family Asteraceae provides a natural comparative system to address the evolutionary dynamics of rDNA, as it is uniquely characterized by the coexistence of two contrasting genomic arrangements: a separate (S-type) and a linked (L-type) organization of 5S and 35S rRNA genes. Here we analyzed rDNA arrangements in 71 representative Asteraceae species (50 S-type and 21 L-type) and, using WGS data and repeatome analyses, we have reconstructed full rDNA units and quantified the intragenomic variability across coding (genic) and non-coding (spacer) regions. No intermediate (coexisting L-type+S-type) genotypes were found. Our results reveal contrasting patterns of 5S rDNA variation depending on its genomic context. S-type species exhibit high levels of 5S polymorphism in both genic and spacer regions, while L-type species show near-complete sequence homogeneity, consistent with variation in homogenization efficiency and selective constraints related to copy number and chromosomal position of 5S rRNA genes. In contrast, 35S rDNA shows a low polymorphism level overall. The findings support a context-dependent view of concerted evolution across rDNA and highlight the influence of genome architecture on rDNA evolution. In particular, the contrasting behavior of 5S (highly conserved when linked but highly variable when separate) emerges as a key example of how structural genomic context shapes the evolution of even the most conserved housekeeping genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.