Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42908269›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2026

The Value of Cleaning a Skin Ulcer Before Obtaining a Swab to Detect Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA and Streptococcus pyogenes.

Ulrich Orda, Sabine Orda, Ronny Gunnarsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ulrich OrdaDarling Downs Hospital and Health Service, Southern Cluster, Warwick Hospital, Warwick, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4887-5060
Sabine OrdaDarling Downs Hospital and Health Service, Southern Cluster, Warwick Hospital, Warwick, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8614-208X
Ronny GunnarssonSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9183-3072

Funding

Emergency Medicine Foundation EMSS-311R26-2016-ROFEWestern Queensland Primary Health Network (WQPHN)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate identification of pathogens in clinically infected skin ulcers is essential for targeted antimicrobial therapy. Although expert consensus recommends mechanical cleansing of the ulcer bed prior to swabbing, there is a lack of empirical evidence to support this practice. This study investigated the impact of mechanical cleansing with sterile cotton gauze pads saturated with isotonic saline or clean water on microbiological results. Triple swabs were collected from 106 patients with skin ulcers at two distinct time points: prior to cleansing (baseline) and immediately following mechanical cleansing. All specimens were analysed using both conventional culture and point-of-care nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) for Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and Streptococcus pyogenes. S. aureus was the most prevalent isolate, with detection rates of 23%-24% by culture and 44%-45% by NAAT. The prevalence and specific bacterial findings remained highly consistent before and after mechanical cleansing, with high levels of concordance across both diagnostic modalities. A sensitivity analysis excluding patients with recent antibiotic use confirmed these findings. Our results demonstrate that mechanical cleansing of the ulcer does not significantly alter the microbiological yield or improve the detection of key pathogens. These findings suggest that the traditional requirement for pre-sampling cleansing may be unnecessary for routine diagnostic swabbing.

Indexed as

DisinfectionMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusSkin UlcerSpecimen HandlingStaphylococcus aureusStreptococcal InfectionsStreptococcus pyogenesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedinfectious skin diseasesmethicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureusnucleic acid amplification techniquesskin ulcerStaphylococcus aureusStreptococcus pyogenes

Identifiers

PMID42908269
PMCPMC13687783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.