ArticleInternational wound journal2026
The Value of Cleaning a Skin Ulcer Before Obtaining a Swab to Detect Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA and Streptococcus pyogenes.
Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate identification of pathogens in clinically infected skin ulcers is essential for targeted antimicrobial therapy. Although expert consensus recommends mechanical cleansing of the ulcer bed prior to swabbing, there is a lack of empirical evidence to support this practice. This study investigated the impact of mechanical cleansing with sterile cotton gauze pads saturated with isotonic saline or clean water on microbiological results. Triple swabs were collected from 106 patients with skin ulcers at two distinct time points: prior to cleansing (baseline) and immediately following mechanical cleansing. All specimens were analysed using both conventional culture and point-of-care nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) for Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and Streptococcus pyogenes. S. aureus was the most prevalent isolate, with detection rates of 23%-24% by culture and 44%-45% by NAAT. The prevalence and specific bacterial findings remained highly consistent before and after mechanical cleansing, with high levels of concordance across both diagnostic modalities. A sensitivity analysis excluding patients with recent antibiotic use confirmed these findings. Our results demonstrate that mechanical cleansing of the ulcer does not significantly alter the microbiological yield or improve the detection of key pathogens. These findings suggest that the traditional requirement for pre-sampling cleansing may be unnecessary for routine diagnostic swabbing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.