Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42908130›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of caring sciences2026

The Balancing Act of Involving Relatives of Hospitalised Patients: A Qualitative Study of Attitudes, Expectations and Involvement Among Patients, Relatives and Healthcare Professionals.

Mona Kyndi Pedersen, Sofie Ladekarl Bøtker, Kirstine Cecilia Ladefoged Nielsen, Karin Dam Eikhof, Ann Karenina Kløve Laugaard, Mettine Thorsmark Madsen, Daniel Krag Nielsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mona Kyndi PedersenCentre for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0812-7244
Sofie Ladekarl BøtkerCentre for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1593-8539
Kirstine Cecilia Ladefoged NielsenDepartment of Nursing, University College of Northern Denmark, Aalborg, Hjoerring and Thisted, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8631-4024
Karin Dam EikhofDepartment of Nursing, University College of Northern Denmark, Aalborg, Hjoerring and Thisted, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5736-353X
Ann Karenina Kløve LaugaardDepartment of Nursing, University College of Northern Denmark, Aalborg, Hjoerring and Thisted, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5015-9517
Mettine Thorsmark MadsenCentre for Clinical Research, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0822-9848
Daniel Krag NielsenDepartment of Nursing, University College of Northern Denmark, Aalborg, Hjoerring and Thisted, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6180-6716

Funding

Marie Pedersen and Jensine Heibergs LegatNorth Denmark Region
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectivesThis study aims to describe the current practices for involving relatives of hospitalised patients. METHODOLOGICAL DESIGN AND JUSTIFICATION: A descriptive qualitative design using a combination of field observations and semi-structured individual interviews with hospitalised patients, relatives and healthcare professionals was applied as part of the first phase of a multiphase Participatory Action Research project. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guided the reporting. ETHICAL ISSUES AND APPROVAL: The study adhered to the Helsinki Declaration and Nordic ethical guidelines for nursing research. All participants provided informed consent. OUTCOME MEASURES AND

findingsThree overarching themes emerged: different strategies and approaches for interaction between relatives and healthcare providers, various roles and positions of relatives and enablers and barriers for involvement of relatives. STUDY LIMITATIONS: The study is limited by a small number of interviewed patients and relatives (all spouses) which may limit the transferability of findings to other types of relatives, such as adult children, as well as to close friends and similar relations, who may have different roles and expectations.

conclusionsInvolvement of relatives in hospital care is a complex balancing act, shaped by professional attitudes and the evolving expectations of patients and relatives. Our findings reveal that relatives occupy shifting roles and may require support themselves, with both organisational and personal factors influencing their involvement. Consequently, recognising the diverse roles and support needs of relatives is essential for preventing misunderstandings and for person- and family-centred care.

Indexed as

FamilyHealth PersonnelHospitalizationInpatientsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchhospital careParticipatory Action Researchpatient‐centred carequalitative researchrelative involvementstrategies

Identifiers

PMID42908130
PMCPMC13687567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.