ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2026
Isolation, Characterization and Molecular Identification of Putative Probiotic Bacteria From Red Tilapia Gut.
Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of probiotics is a promising strategy to enhance fish health and sustainability in aquaculture as alternatives to antibiotics. This study applied a systematic multi-criteria screening approach to identify autochthonous probiotic candidates from the intestinal microbiota of healthy red tilapia (Oreochromis sp.). A total of 26 culturable bacterial isolates were recovered and evaluated for antimicrobial activity against major fish pathogens (Aeromonas hydrophila, Streptococcus agalactiae and Streptococcus iniae), safety, tolerance to simulated gastrointestinal conditions, adhesion-related properties, enzymatic activities and environmental robustness. Only a small subset of isolates exhibited broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity and satisfied subsequent safety and functional criteria. Based on integrated performance, three isolates were shortlisted for advanced evaluation, of which two were retained for molecular identification. The selected isolates were identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing as Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA4 (PA4) and Bacillus sp. BA4P (BA4P). Both strains demonstrated tolerance to gastrointestinal stress, measurable adhesion-related hydrophobicity, diverse enzymatic activities and stability under varying temperature and salinity conditions. These findings provide a robust framework for screening host-associated probiotics and support the further evaluation of PA4 and BA4P as potential candidates for sustainable tilapia aquaculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.