ArticleBMC psychology2026
Key skills and challenges in one-on-one peer support for older adolescents and young adults with serious mental health conditions.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeer support for older adolescents and young adults has become increasingly available as a formal mental health service. Alongside this increasing availability has been a steady accumulation of studies examining the potential for peer support to lead to positive outcomes for peer support users. However, a consistent refrain from the literature on peer support is that research and practice are hampered by a lack of theory-based models that specify the activities and skills of specific peer support roles, and describe how skillful practice is linked to outcomes. As part of a larger study intended to help fill this gap, the current study aimed to define a set of key skills and related challenges in one-on-one peer support for older youth and young adults.
methodsThe study engaged peer support specialists (PSSs) and peer support users (PSUs) from first episode psychosis (FEP) and non-diagnostic-specific (NDS) programs across the United States in a series of discussion groups focused on the activities, skills and outcomes of effective peer support. Qualitative analysis of the discussion group material led to the specification of six general skill areas and, within each of these, a series of sub-skills and key practice challenges. In a second phase of the study, the PSSs reviewed a document describing these, rated the importance of each of the skills and challenges, and provided open-ended feedback on wording and conceptualization. Based on feedback, wording of practice skills and challenges was finalized, and a set of related organizational challenges connected to each skill area was added to the document.
resultsAll of the mean importance ratings for sub-skills and challenges were above 4.25 on a 5-point scale for which 4 = very important and 5 = extremely important. PSSs from FEP and NDS programs provided similar ratings for sub-skills and challenges, with a few exceptions.
conclusionsThe final document produced from this study contains information about skills and challenges that has similarities to other studies of PSS skills, but also has unique features. Results from the study have practical implications for training, supervision and organizational development to support the PSS role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.