Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42908023›Full record

ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2026

Assessing patient satisfaction at a medical student-organized free community skin cancer screening.

Mary Elizabeth Kerr, Mehraeil Zaki, Shekhar Gugnani, Grace Keirn, Jonique Depina, Urmi Khanna, K Allen Greiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mary Elizabeth KerrThe University of Kansas School of Medicine, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, KS, 66160, Kansas City, USA. mkerr4@kumc.edu.
Mehraeil ZakiKansas City University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Shekhar GugnaniThe University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Grace KeirnThe University of Kansas School of Medicine, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, KS, 66160, Kansas City, USA.
Jonique DepinaKansas City University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Urmi KhannaDepartment of Dermatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center and Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH, USA.
K Allen GreinerDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSkin cancer screening is a safe and simple screening test in medicine. To provide skin cancer screenings for the Kansas City (KC) metropolitan area, students from local medical schools collaborated with dermatologists to organize the first annual collaborative skin cancer screening event.

methodsTo assess patient satisfaction and barriers to dermatologic care, participants completed a survey, which included multiple-choice questions addressing demographics, access to dermatologic care, and event satisfaction. Statistical significance was determined using Fisher's Exact and chi-square tests.

resultsA total of 48 screenings were performed and 46 attendees participated in the study. The majority of participants were female (61%), White (65%), English-speaking (80%), with at least a bachelor's degree (72%) and health insurance (78%). Most participants had not been seen for a skin concern in the past year (70%) and had never attended a community screening event (89%). Many participants (50%) stated they would not have had an annual skin check without the event. Participants were largely satisfied with the event, and most reported being very likely to attend again. Race was associated with prior attendance at a screening event (p = 0.045) and reporting cost (p = 0.0099) or lack of insurance (p = 0.0016) as barriers to care. Younger age was associated with first-time screening attendance (p = 0.004). DISCUSSION: Despite being free and open to the public, the event primarily attracted groups not traditionally underserved. These findings support ongoing efforts to expand community-based screening initiatives in the KC area.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerMass ScreeningPatient SatisfactionSkin NeoplasmsStudents, MedicalAdultAgedCommunity Health ServicesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansKansasMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42908023
PMCPMC13685341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.