Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42908019›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Work-time arrangements, career progression, and job satisfaction among physicians in Germany: a cross-sectional survey.

Vogel Carolina, Stangl Dorina, Habel Silke, Histing Tina, Büchin Petra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vogel CarolinaDepartment of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Tübingen, BG Trauma Center, Tübingen, Germany. cvogel@bgu-tuebingen.de.
Stangl DorinaDepartment of Cardiology and Pulmonology, Fürth Hospital (Klinikum Fürth), Fürth, Germany.
Habel SilkeDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Offenburg Trauma Center, Ortenau Clinic Group, Offenburg, Germany.
Histing TinaDepartment of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Tübingen, BG Trauma Center, Tübingen, Germany.
Büchin PetraCenter for Spine Surgery and Spine Therapy, Karl Olga Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDemographic change and evolving expectations regarding work-life balance are increasingly challenging the medical workforce in Germany. Work-time arrangements play a key role in physician job satisfaction, well-being, and career development. However, part-time and alternative working models remain unevenly implemented and are frequently perceived as limiting career opportunities. This study characterized current work-time arrangements among physicians in Germany and examined satisfaction, employer support, colleague acceptance, perceived career opportunities, barriers to reducing working hours, and work-family balance.

methodsThis cross-sectional study is based on an anonymous digital survey conducted by the German Medical Women's Association between September 2022 and July 2023. Physicians across medical specialties and career stages were invited to participate. The questionnaire assessed sociodemographic and professional characteristics, work-time arrangements (full-time, part-time, and alternative models), satisfaction with current arrangements, employer support, and perceived career opportunities.

resultsOf the 898 respondents, 90.9% were women and 46.2% were resident physicians. Full-time employment was the most common arrangement (56.8%). Physicians working in non-full-time arrangements were more frequently satisfied with their work-time arrangement than those working full-time (52.8% vs. 45.3%; p = 0.020). Hospital-based physicians were less likely to be satisfied with their work-time arrangement (aOR 0.33) or to receive support from their employer in implementing alternative work-time arrangements (aOR 0.24). They were also less likely to report acceptance of alternative work-time arrangements among colleagues (aOR 0.21) and equal career opportunities under such arrangements (aOR 0.31), while being more likely to report difficulties balancing work and family responsibilities (aOR 2.44; all p < 0.001). Compared with physicians in leadership positions, resident physicians and board-certified physicians without leadership responsibility reported lower satisfaction and lower perceived equal career opportunities, while reporting greater difficulty balancing work and family responsibilities (all p < 0.001). Fear of negative career consequences was the most frequently reported reason for not reducing working hours (58.2%), and approximately two thirds of respondents perceived unequal career opportunities for colleagues using alternative work-time arrangements.

conclusionsAlthough full-time employment remained the most common arrangement, respondents not working full-time reported greater satisfaction. Part-time and alternative work-time-arrangements are widely perceived as career-limiting. Addressing structural barriers and ensuring equal career opportunities for physicians who require or prefer family-friendly working conditions are essential for physician well-being, workforce retention, and the long-term resilience of healthcare systems.

Indexed as

Career MobilityJob SatisfactionPhysiciansWork-Life BalanceAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesWork Schedule ToleranceCareer mobilityGender equityJob satisfactionPhysiciansWork schedule tolerance

Identifiers

PMID42908019
PMCPMC13688778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.