ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2026
Functionalized metal-organic frameworks as smart nanoplatforms: advancing tumor precision therapy through post-synthetic surface tailoring, challenges, and prospects for clinical translation.
Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have garnered significant attention as versatile nanocarriers for oncological drug delivery, owing to their exceptional porosity, structural tunability, extensive specific surface areas, and favorable drug loading and release kinetics, which collectively enable targeted payload delivery and reduced systemic toxicity. Nevertheless, the clinical promise of unmodified MOFs is severely curtailed by substantial in vivo biological barriers-including rapid bio-clearance, the immunosuppressive and acidic tumor microenvironment (TME), and inefficient cellular internalization-challenges that are ubiquitous across nanomedicine platforms and critically undermine therapeutic outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive examination of post-synthetic modification (PSM) as an indispensable strategy to surmount these obstacles. It systematically categorizes the diverse array of surface modifiers reported to date into natural polymers, synthetic polymers, nonpolymeric small molecules, inorganic materials, and multifunctional hybrid architectures, while elucidating how each class can enhance biocompatibility, colloidal stability, circulation half-life, active targeting, and stimuli-responsive cargo release. Crucially, the review critically appraises the intrinsic trade-offs introduced by surface engineering, including increased hydrodynamic diameter, impaired tumor penetration, heightened synthetic and characterization complexity, and unpredictable perturbations to biodegradation pathways and immune system interactions. Despite robust preclinical validation, the translational trajectory of surface-engineered MOF-based therapeutics remains encumbered by formidable challenges spanning scalable and reproducible manufacturing, long-term biosafety assessment, and stringent regulatory approval. By delineating current advances, critical limitations, and prospective directions, this review highlights the delicate equilibrium between surface functionalization and biological performance that must be achieved to realize the clinical potential of PSM-optimized MOF nanomedicines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.