Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42907992›Full record

ReviewBiomedical engineering online2026

AI-integrated nanomaterial-based biosensors for biomedical diagnostics: engineering design, signal processing, and clinical translation.

Chandrashekar Thalluri, Sarad Pawar Naik Bukke, Jharna Medhi, Mallikarjun Vasam, Ananda Kumar Chettupalli, Neha Gupta, Koushik Narayan Sarma, Milon Selvam Dennison, Bukke Pasunath Naik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedical engineering online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chandrashekar ThalluriFaculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Assam down town University (AdtU), Guwahati, Assam, 781026, India. chandu6716@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8859-8315
Sarad Pawar Naik BukkeDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Victoria University, Victoria Towers, 1-13 Jinja Road, P.O. Box 30866, Kampala, Uganda. drsaradpawar@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5693-2953
Jharna MedhiFaculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Assam down town University (AdtU), Guwahati, Assam, 781026, India.
Mallikarjun VasamDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Omega College of Pharmacy, Osmania University, Edulabad, Ghatkesar, Hyderabad, Telangana, 501301, India.
Ananda Kumar ChettupalliDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Adamas University, Adamas Knowledge City, Barasat-Barrackpore, District-24 Parganas (North), Kolkata, West Bengal, 700 126, India.
Neha GuptaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Aligarh College of Pharmacy, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, 202001, India.
Koushik Narayan SarmaFaculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Assam down town University (AdtU), Guwahati, Assam, 781026, India.
Milon Selvam DennisonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Kampala International University, Western Campus, P.O. Box 71, Ishaka-Bushenyi, Uganda.
Bukke Pasunath NaikDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering (ECE), Indian Institute of Information Technology Design and Manufacturing (IIITDM) Kancheepuram, Vandalur-Kelambakkam Road, Melakottaiyur, Chennai, Tamilnadu, 600127, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanobiosensor platforms based on nanomaterials have the potential to change the future of biomedical diagnostics with highly sensitive detection as well as quick responses and various functionalities. This review article will systematically outline the design principles, signal transduction mechanisms, and the biomedical use of nanobiosensors with a strong focus on including AI and wearable technologies to achieve these benefits. Examples of nanomaterials (organic and inorganic, as well as hybrid), including metallic nanoparticles, graphene derivatives, quantum dots, and polymer nanocomposites, allow nanobiosensors to provide increased biosensor performance using mechanisms such as electrochemical transduction, surface plasmon resonance, Förster resonance energy transfer, and surface enhanced Raman scattering. These mechanisms make it possible to detect biomarkers with incredible sensitivity for many different types of diseases, such as all types of infection, cancer, and metabolic disorders. Furthermore, when nanobiosensors are combined with AI and IoT applications, they provide a means of processing data in real time, utilizing predictive analytics and monitoring health based on individualized care. While significant progress has been made over the past decade, barriers to translation remain, including scaling up manufacturing capacity, achieving consistent, reproducible results, validating effectiveness in clinical settings, and obtaining FDA approval for use. This review article will compare various types of biosensing platforms and their respective strengths and limitations; discuss the current challenges faced in developing these platforms; and define future areas of focus for research.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBiosensing TechniquesNanostructuresSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedTranslational Research, BiomedicalEquipment DesignHumansArtificial intelligence integrationBiomedical diagnosticsNanobiosensorsNanomaterialsPoint-of-care monitoringSignal transduction mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID42907992
PMCPMC13688831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.