ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Development and external validation of a preoperative prediction model for in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events after hip fracture surgery in older adults: a retrospective two-center study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOlder adults with hip fracture are vulnerable to postoperative major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during hospitalization. However, early risk stratification remains difficult because existing assessments may require complex or late-available information. A simple model based on variables routinely available before surgery may support perioperative decision-making.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective two-center cohort study of patients ≥ 60 years who underwent surgery for traumatic hip fracture at 2 hospitals in China. The development cohort included 935 patients treated between January 2024 and December 2025, and the external validation cohort included 168 patients treated between January 2020 and December 2025. Candidate preoperative predictors were screened using penalized regression. Six candidate prediction models were developed and compared using the same preprocessing pipeline. The final model was calibrated using Platt scaling. Model performance was assessed in an internal test set and an external validation cohort.
resultsIn the development cohort, 122 of 935 patients developed postoperative in-hospital MACE. The final model was a Platt-calibrated logistic regression model including age, baseline electrocardiographic abnormality, chronic heart failure, serum potassium, albumin, and hemoglobin. In the internal test set, the model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.814, with a 95% CI of 0.748-0.876, and a Brier score of 0.102. At the prespecified threshold of 0.147, sensitivity was 0.710 and specificity was 0.754. In the external validation cohort, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.760, with a 95% CI of 0.657-0.849. The Brier score was 0.141, sensitivity was 0.788, specificity was 0.630, and negative predictive value was 0.924.
conclusionsA simple preoperative logistic regression model based on routinely available clinical variables showed moderate discrimination in internal testing and provided preliminary external validation evidence for predicting postoperative in-hospital MACE after hip fracture surgery in older adults. The model may support early perioperative risk stratification and postoperative surveillance, although prospective multicenter validation and recalibration are needed before wider clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.