ReviewCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2026
ACR lung-RADS: updates and future directions.
Review in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and low-dose CT (LDCT) screening has been shown to significantly reduce lung cancer deaths in high-risk populations. The American College of Radiology (ACR) introduced the Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) in 2014 to standardize the reporting and management of screen-detected pulmonary nodules. Since its inception, Lung-RADS has undergone iterative updates reflecting advances in evidence, clinical practice, and the expanding scope of lung cancer screening. This review summarizes the major updates to Lung-RADS, highlights areas of active discussion within the Lung-RADS Committee, and outlines future research directions. Key topics include the ongoing evaluation of volumetric versus diameter-based nodule measurement, the management of subsolid nodules and the balance between surveillance and intervention, the implementation of Category 0 for infectious or inflammatory findings, clarification of juxtapleural nodule classification, the approach to incidental findings, and the development of a Lung-RADS Atlas. Future directions address the integration of risk-based and category-based assessment approaches, the role of artificial intelligence and deep learning in nodule stratification, the potential incorporation of incidental nodules into Lung-RADS, and the prospect of international harmonization for lung cancer screening reporting and management. Lung-RADS has become an essential reporting and quality tool for lung cancer screening in the United States and increasingly worldwide. Continued refinement, guided by emerging evidence, multidisciplinary collaboration, and technological innovation, will be critical to advancing precision screening strategies and reducing the global burden of lung cancer.Clinical trial numberNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.