ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Modelling complex sports adaptation with electrocardiography: analysis of standard ECG, heart rate variability and QRST integral changes in elite athletes.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBasic resting electrocardiographic changes caused by regular intense exercise are known characteristics of the athlete's heart. Through detailed analysis of short-term ECG recordings, our aim was to study electrocardiographic, heart rate variability, and ventricular heterogeneity changes of the athlete's heart as a function of factors influencing sports adaptation.
methodsAnalysis of 1-minute resting lead I ECG recordings was used to determine standard ECG parameters, time-domain indicators of heart rate variability, and mean and standard deviation of QRST integrals. Statistical analysis was performed in Python development environment.
results500 healthy athletes (age: 19[16-24]y, male: 55%, training: 16.7 ± 6.5 h/w) were compared with 100 non-athlete controls (age: 21[17-23]y, male: 51%). Athletes had lower heart rate (68[61-78]vs.82[73-91]BPM, p < 0.001), increased p-wave amplitude (89[71-108]vs.80[62-96]µV, p < 0.001), PQ interval (152[140-168]vs.142[132-152]ms, p < 0.001), QRS width (90[82-100]vs.82[78-90]ms, p < 0.001), T-wave amplitude (257[198-311]vs.195[146-248]µV, p < 0.001), SDNN (64.7[47.2-87.2]vs.50.6[36.5-66.3]ms, p < 0.001), RMSSD (52.6[34.8-78.3]vs.36.4[26.8-52.6]ms, p < 0.001), pNN50 (31.1[12.7-50.9]vs.14.7[4.9-31.6]%, p < 0.001) and mean QRST integral (34.9[28.3-43.4]vs.26.1[19.7-33.9]mV*ms, p < 0.001) compared to controls. Mixed athletes had wider QRS compared to power athletes (94[90-102]vs.88[84-96]ms, p < 0.005). Male athletes had lower QTc, increased PQ interval, QRS width, T-wave amplitude, mean QRST integral, and its deviation. In the control group, females had higher resting heart rate and QTc duration, while AVNN and the relative deviation of QRST integral were lower. Many of the above parameters also showed weak correlation with age and weekly exercise hours.
conclusionsOur findings indicate that a 1-minute lead I ECG recording can detect electrical differences between athletes and non-athlete controls and may provide a practical framework for future longitudinal studies of athletic cardiac adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.