ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2026
Repeatability and replicability of the Respiratory Symptom Experience Scale (RSES): internal and external validation of smoking-status differences in respiratory symptoms.
Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRespiratory symptoms are common among smokers without COPD, yet symptom instruments are often optimized for established disease and may under-capture early changes relevant to cessation and tobacco harm reduction. We conducted a repeatability and replicability study of the Respiratory Symptom Experience Scale (RSES) in a rigorously phenotyped cohort to confirm both measurement stability and reproducible discrimination by smoking status.
methodsHealthy adults were recruited at a UK hospital and classified as current, former, or never smokers using self-report, exhaled CO, and a comprehensive panel of biomarkers of exposure. RSES was administered at Visit 1 and repeated after 7 ± 3 days at Visit 2 to assess test-retest repeatability. Known-group validity (discriminability by smoking status) was evaluated by comparing RSES scores across biochemically verified groups using non-parametric tests, with ANCOVA for exploratory covariate adjustment. True replicability across independent datasets was not formally tested in the present study.
resultsOf 180 enrolled participants, 170 were included (55 current smokers, 60 former smokers, 55 never smokers) after excluding clinical ineligibility and biomarker-inconsistent smoking status. RSES demonstrated high repeatability (Pearson r = 0.87; Spearman ρ = 0.85) with minimal bias (- 0.07) and good agreement. RSES also showed consistent known-group discrimination by smoking status, differing between current and never smokers (p < 0.0001) and across all three groups (p < 0.0001). Current smokers reported higher scores than never (median 2.0 vs. 1.0) and former smokers (2.0 vs. 1.2), whereas former and never smokers did not differ (p = 0.686). Covariate adjustment did not materially alter results.
conclusionsRSES shows strong repeatability and consistent known-group discrimination by smoking status, supporting its use as a patient-relevant endpoint for cessation, and harm-reduction trials, as well as for clinical respiratory and regulatory research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.