ArticleBMC pharmacology & toxicology2026
When drug repurposing backfires: antagonistic effects of ivermectin on cisplatin therapy in oral cancer.
Article in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCisplatin (CIS) remains the gold standard chemotherapeutic agent for the management of oral cancer. However, its clinical efficacy is frequently limited by chemoresistance and dose-dependent toxicities. Ivermectin (IVM), a well-established antiparasitic agent with emerging anticancer properties, has been proposed as a potential adjuvant capable of enhancing the antitumor efficacy of CIS.
methodsIn vitro experiments were conducted on HN9 oral squamous cell carcinoma cells, while OEC normal epithelial cells served as control. The experimental evaluation comprised the MTT assay for cell viability, Annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) staining for apoptosis detection, cell cycle distribution analysis, quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) for the assessment of apoptotic, anti-apoptotic, and inflammatory gene expression, and oxidative stress assay.
resultsContrary to expectations, the CIS-IVM combination demonstrated an antagonistic interaction in HN9 cells. This was evidenced by reduced cytotoxicity of the combination treatment compared to CIS monotherapy, as determined by the MTT assay. Additionally, the combination attenuated CIS-induced S-phase arrest and was associated with decreased expression of pro-apoptotic markers (BAX and Caspase-3). Differential modulation of TNF-α expression and glutathione levels further suggested complex interactions affecting inflammatory and oxidative stress pathways. These findings indicate that IVM may interfere with CIS-induced cytotoxicity, potentially through its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties.
conclusionsThe present study demonstrated an unexpected antagonistic interaction between CIS and IVM in HN9 oral cancer cells. Further investigations are warranted to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms and to determine whether similar effects occur in other oral cancer models or in vivo settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.