ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Time-critical sepsis interventions and clinical outcomes among children in a tertiary Tanzanian emergency department.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPediatric sepsis remains a leading cause of mortality in resource-limited settings. We evaluated the delivery of time-critical sepsis interventions and their association with in-hospital mortality among children in Tanzania.
methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of children (28 days to 14 years) presenting with sepsis to the Emergency Medicine Department at Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (July 2022 to November 2024). Sepsis was defined as fever and at least one World Health Organization warning sign. Local pediatric sepsis guidelines recommend antibiotics and intravenous fluids (IVF) for all patients with sepsis, regardless of the source. Primary exposures were receipt and timing of antibiotics and IVF. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, nutritional status, referral status, and illness severity.
resultsAmong 755 children, 61.2% (n = 462) received antibiotics, and 55.6% (n = 420) received IVF. Median time to intervention was 2.4 h (IQR 1.6-3.7). 35.5% (n = 268) received both interventions, and only 3.7% (n = 28) received them within one hour. In-hospital mortality was 19.6% (n = 148), with a median time to death of 4.1 days (IQR 1.6-9.5). In a multivariable analysis, time to initiation of both antibiotics and IVF was not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR 1.29; 95% CI 0.83-2.0; p = 0.264). When modeled continuously, a longer time to IVF administration was associated with increased mortality risk (HR 1.05 per hour delay; 95% CI 1.01-1.10).
conclusionsReceipt of time-critical sepsis interventions (antibiotics and IVF) was delayed and inconsistent, with no observed association with decreased mortality, although residual confounding may remain. This both highlights gaps in early evidence-based care delivery and suggests additional, system-related influences on pediatric sepsis outcomes. Our findings underscore the need for context-specific strategies to strengthen pediatric sepsis management in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.